Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Lifegain | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mardu Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | stickywicket | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Superfriends , Esper Midrange , Esper Pixie , Mardu Demons , Mardu Midrange , Mardu Offering , Mardu Tokens , Mono White Control , Orzhov Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Restless Fortress ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Restless Fortress is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 29.48 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Restless Fortress has a win rate of 70.7%, making it 4.9% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serra Paragon | Creature — Angel | 6 | 69.4% | 1 |
| Binding Negotiation | Sorcery | 5 | 69.3% | 0 |
| Urza's Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 13 | 62.9% | 2 |
| Get Out | Instant | 9 | 62.6% | 2 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 20 | 62.3% | 3 |
| Prophetic Prism | Artifact | 10 | 62.1% | 2 |
| Ancient Vendetta | Sorcery | 14 | 58.2% | 2 |
| Thundertrap Trainer | Creature — Otter Wizard | 8 | 58.0% | 1 |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 7 | 57.8% | 1 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 11 | 57.8% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Restless Fortress than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 5 | 83.3% | 71.9% | +11.4% |
| Tinybones Joins Up | Legendary Enchantment | 1 | 6 | 75.0% | 73.8% | +1.2% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 9 | 74.6% | 75.1% | -0.5% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 20 | 68.5% | 70.0% | -1.5% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 18 | 70.1% | 72.4% | -2.3% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 12 | 68.8% | 72.2% | -3.3% |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 66.7% | 70.5% | -3.8% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 17 | 67.7% | 72.0% | -4.3% |
| Scrollshift | Instant | 3 | 12 | 62.8% | 67.5% | -4.7% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 21 | 66.7% | 71.4% | -4.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | 64 | 87.7% | 46.7% |
| Orzhov Lifegain | 60 | 76.9% | 26.2% |
| Orzhov Demons | 23 | 82.1% | 42.4% |
| Esper Pixie | 17 | 1.1% | 54.5% |
| Unknown Archetype | 15 | 4.1% | 42.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.